ext_8742 ([identity profile] morgan32.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] briarwood 2007-01-30 07:19 am (UTC)

but slash doesn't equal smut, so just because there's no fucking doesn't mean there can be no slash. I mean, I know you talk about subtext but it can be more than just subtext even without the whole smut factor.

Slash doesn't have to include sex. That's true.

The thing is, I'm very much a plot-driven writer. If I write with the premise that two characters are lovers, then it's likely at some stage in a story I'll reach a point where it would be natural for them to have sex. And, yeah, I could do the fade-to-black thing, but often, when I reach that point, I find the nature of the sex is important, so I must include that scene. (Like in Protector when I finally got Jim and Blair into the same bed - it would have ruined the story completely if I hadn't shown how they had sex.)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org