ext_8742 ([identity profile] morgan32.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] briarwood 2008-06-28 01:57 pm (UTC)

I realised that as attached as people can be to OTPs, reading Sasuke/Naruto when you thought you were getting Naruto/Sasuke isn't likely to be a traumatic experience.

Oh, I don't know. When I was in Stargate SG-1 fandom there were plenty of fans who claimed to be seriously traumatised by any hint of het romance in a fic...

Or to put it even more simply, labels are there to attract readers and warnings are there to, in a sense, turn them away.

Yes, that sums it up pretty well. I have issues with "warning" for everything myself; generally if there's something I don't want to give away I make the warning as vague as I can and add a note that the reader can always ask me about specific triggers.

The thing is, for most things, whether you call it a warning or a label, it serves the same purpose. For some reason piss-play is quite popular in Supernatural slash fics; but I can take the label as a warning to hit the back button just as well as someone else might take it as an enticement to read.

But what happens when the warning/label means different things to different people? In the Dean/Jess story I linked to above, is that really enough to be triggering for someone? If so, if it should have a warning on it, that warning can't serve the dual purpose of attracting a reader, like me, who enjoys dub-con...because to me that story is fully consensual.

I doubt we'll ever get a real consensus in fandom on the subject of warnings. This is just me realising the issue is more complex than I'd realised before.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org