More on labelling fan artists child pornographers

[briarwood]

Related to my post earlier today, imaginarycircus has posted an open letter to LJ/SA attempting to explain why their describing fan art as child porn (which it cannot be, legally, as no actual child is involved) is so damned insulting.

Please, if you, like me, understand that there's a difference, consider signing the open letter at the link below.

http://imaginarycircus.livejournal.com/128054.html

This isn't about supporting explicit fan art. If you have issues with explicit artworks, I get it. So do I (though mine run more to photomanips than to drawings).

This is about LJ admins publicly equating two fan artists to people who rape children.